PKTT video footage expert

A video footage and document analysis expert whose testimony before the commission centred on the integrity of evidentiary materials, this specialist was engaged to assess whether certain records had been altered. Counsel questioned the scope of his mandate, noting that he was asked to comment on clinical objections raised by another party's doctor rather than to render a full opinion, and that the limited material provided—chiefly an affidavit—would have prevented a meaningful analysis in any case. His findings were cited in arguments alleging that panel-related documents had been tampered with, with the expert reportedly able to identify that something had been inserted into the record, though the precise nature of that alteration remained a point of contention in the proceedings.