Mansha Raphesu

Mansha Raphesu is an investigator whose work and recollections came under scrutiny during the commission’s proceedings, particularly regarding his handling of a section 27 affidavit and related documentation. Testimony described him as someone who would have consulted with complainants, prepared materials in advance of meetings, and shared an office with fellow investigators. He faced questions about the timing and basis of a premature action, with concerns raised over whether a witness would confirm receiving certain information. His role in the investigative process, including his familiarity with A1 affidavits in dockets, was central to discussions about how evidence was gathered and presented.