WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 55

6 February 2026

Record: Official record ↗

Who testified

Subjects discussed

👤 Brigadier Matjeng👤 Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala👤 Adv Thabang Pooe👤 Adv Premhid👤 General Phahlane👤 Mr Shirindzi (R.T.)👤 Suliman Carim🏛 Madlanga Commission (Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System)

11 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-1f9a49f8c12a
WhatsApp chat extract from Mr Matlala's phone
Claim A attributes the downloads to Witness F's phone; Claim B says the chats come from Mr Matlala's phone—same extract, different source.
Day 65Adv Hassim SC“These are downloads from Witness F's phone”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“we are only dealing with the chats that comes from the phone of Mr Matlala”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-42f585338d53
the SAPS HR Division letter to Mr Cat Matlala
Same letter's cancellation reason stated as 'continued poor performance' vs 'misrepresentation' — incompatible grounds.
Day 55Adv Pooe“Continued poor performance.”
Day 55Adv Pooe“Which include misrepresentation”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-bb49b61b5fdc
the SAPS HR Division letter to Mr Cat Matlala
Two different stated reasons for the same cancellation: pending charges vs poor performance; cannot both be the reason.
Day 55Adv Pooe“The issues related to Mr Matlala and the pending charges.”
Day 55Adv Pooe“Continued poor performance.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-12845758a311
Brigadier Matjeng
Same 100k request given two incompatible purposes: a 'specific function' vs paying a judgment on her name.
Day 55Mr Shirindzi“she required the money for a specific function”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“I was requesting it to pay a judgment that was on my name.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-3670f34e0cae
Brigadier Matjeng
Claim B admits receiving payment as a gift, while Claim A denies receiving any financial benefit—both cannot be true.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“No, I will not.”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“I was received as a boyfriend gifting a girlfriend .”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-74bf05a97650
Brigadier Matjeng
Claim A denies receiving financial benefit; Claim B admits receiving payments as a girlfriend allowance—cannot both be true.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“No, I will not.”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“No, I was receiving it as a girlfriend allowance. I did not do any favour for Mr Matlala. This, I was received as a boyfriend gifting a girlfriend .”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-992ca1b2a2bf
Brigadier Matjeng
One says overstepping happened only once; other says more than one occasion—cannot both be true of same conduct.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“only one incident”
Day 55Adv Pooe“it was on more than one occasion that Brigadier agreed that she overstepped”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-aaffa9f74d79
Brigadier Matjeng
A affirms it was (sad) for self; B denies it was sad for self — same referent, direct contradiction.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“It was.”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“It was not sad for me.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c7ec2a799081
Brigadier Matjeng
Claim A says received no money; Claim B says started receiving money June 2019—same person, cannot both be true.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“No, it did not”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“I started receiving money from Mr Matlala in 2019, June 20”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-dc3eb2bc2ac1
Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala
Same entity describing Signal vs WhatsApp: 'works better' and 'works the same' cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“It works better than WhatsApp.”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“He says it works the same as WhatsApp.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-e33c7238683f
Brigadier Matjeng
Same entity, same referent (Adv Pooe's characterisation): one explicitly disagrees, the other agrees—cannot both be true.
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“No, I do not agree.”
Day 55Brigadier Matjeng“Yes.”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days

Source: criminaljusticecommission.org.za — official transcripts and audio. Protected and pseudonymous witnesses are not identified.

© 2026 Datastroom IT (Pty) Ltd · Published in the public interest · Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Commission