WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 62

18 February 2026

Record: Official record ↗

Who testified

Subjects discussed

👤 Mr. Shadrack Sibiya👤 Adv Hassim SC🏛 National Task Team Investigating Political Related Cases in KZN (2024/2025 request)🏛 City of Johannesburg Metro Municipality👤 Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi (suspended EMPD/Metro chief; admits payments from Cat Matlala)🏛 South African Police Service👤 Lt Gen Samuel Dumisani Khumalo👤 Lt Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi

13 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-2c84fcb53627
National Task Team Investigating Political Related Cases in KZN
A says PKTT reports to IMC chaired by Minister; B claims it reports to 'me' (the speaker), incompatible reporting lines.
“The PKTT directly reports to the IMC: Chaired by the Police Minister”
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“the structure of the police that shows exactly that this Political Killing Task Team, who it reports to, and that he himself, he signed the same struc”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-9ba42114f378
Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala
One states Matlala was not under investigation or scrutiny; the other states he was under investigation—directly contradictory of same entity.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“he was really not under investigation, nor under scrutiny”
Day 65Adv Hassim SC“there were allegations, he was under investigation”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-03f9aeac4d52
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
Claim A states signing on 19 Sept 2024; Claim B explicitly corrects to 16th not 19th — same act, incompatible dates.
Day 62Lieutenant General Shadrach Sibiya“I signed on the 19th of September 2024”
Day 62Chairperson“16th, not 19th.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-0cbedcc51732
Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala
Same entity's investigation status cannot be both 'not under investigation' and 'being investigated as a suspect'.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“he was really not under investigation, nor under scrutiny”
Day 75Adv Pooe“the number of cases where Mr Matlala was being investigated as a suspect.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-19a6558df825
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
Claiming a smooth relationship with the NC directly contradicts stating he suffers the NC's 'BS' — incompatible characterizations.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“I thought we were running smoothly with the National Commissioner”
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“I suffer the BS of the National Commissioner”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-9ba42114f378
Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala
Same entity's investigation status: 'not under investigation' directly contradicts 'under investigation'.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“he was really not under investigation, nor under scrutiny”
Day 65Adv Hassim SC“there were allegations, he was under investigation”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-9daf8ade1e39
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
A affirms he changed the name; B says saying he changed it is a mistake—directly contradictory about same act.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“Consequently, I changed the name on the implementation plan to my own”
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“it is a mistake when I say I changed it, because I signed it”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-a08f7064f023
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
A denies any involvement in PKTT; B affirms getting involved in PKTT—cannot both be true of same person.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“I was not involved in the PKTT at all”
Day 63Lieutenant General Sibiya“at that point in time, it was the very first time that I got involved into the PKTT.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-a26bd48aa3b6
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
A denies changing it (calls saying so a mistake); B affirms 'I changed it to my signature'—directly opposing claims about same act.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“it is a mistake when I say I changed it, because I signed it”
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“I responded by saying, but I changed it to my signature because the National Commissioner said it is operational”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-b9ddb03a0814
Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala
A claims never under investigation/scrutiny; B claims he was a person of interest/suspect since 2000—both cannot be true of same entity.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“he was really not under investigation, nor under scrutiny”
Day 75Adv Pooe“Mr Matlala has been either a person of interest or a suspect in a number of cases from the year 2000.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-ca7ffc25c4d3
National Task Team Investigating Political Related Cases in KZN
A claims purpose achieved; B directly asserts it was not, citing unattended cases since 2018-2020. Cannot both be true.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“the PKTT has achieved the purpose for which they were established”
Day 63Lieutenant General Sibiya“Because if that was the case, we would not be sitting with so many cases that are not attended since 2018, 2019, 2020.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-df0d1f4433af
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
Same entity and referent (the report copy); claiming both received and not received cannot both be true.
Day 62Lieutenant General Sibiya“Yes, I did receive a copy of the report.”
Day 63Lieutenant General Sibiya“I was not favoured with the copy”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-ed6baed98882
Mr. Shadrack Sibiya
Claim A says he received document 114; Claim B says he never got the document himself—directly opposed on same referent.
Day 62Lieutenant General Shadrach Sibiya“I got it 114”
Day 66Lieutenant General Sibiya“I never got the document myself”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days

Source: criminaljusticecommission.org.za — official transcripts and audio. Protected and pseudonymous witnesses are not identified.

© 2026 Datastroom IT (Pty) Ltd · Published in the public interest · Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Commission