WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 90

15 April 2026

Who testified

Subjects discussed

👤 Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi (suspended EMPD/Metro chief; admits payments from Cat Matlala)👤 Jaco Hanekom👤 Mr Magagula (IPID investigator)👤 Marius Van Der Merwe (Witness D)👤 Constable Kecia Stols🏛 Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department (EMPD) / the City👤 Adv Mahlape Sello SC👤 Alexander Fritz

25 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-0775e7092e06
Same person's self-introduced rank differs: 'Superintendent' vs 'chief superintendent'—cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 90Adv Sello SC“he introduced himself as Superintendent Julius Mkhwanazi to myself and Etienne”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I introduce myself as a chief superintendent”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-42cf4946aeff
A affirms knowing Stolls; B denies knowing them—same referent, same person, cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, I do not know them.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-4863750cb790
A claims meeting Kobus last year (implying knowledge), B says unsure about Kobus—same referent, incompatible.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I know Jaco because we met with this guy, Kobus, last year when we were called by IP ID”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I am not sure about Kobus.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-4cd02ed90bf5
A denies meeting him and Etienne; B affirms meeting them, directly contradicting same meeting claim.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“when I met them after that”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-5624e9374283
A claims knowledge of full name incl. surname 'Van Der Walt'; B says surname of Etienne unknown—same referent, cannot both hold.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I do not know the surname of Etienne.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-668c6370ae43
Same entity states both non-compliance and compliance regarding apparently the same matter; cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I did not comply”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“And I complied.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-c3faf1621bf4
Etienne
Claim A states Etienne is from EMPD; Claim B affirms he is not an EMPD officer—same person, contradictory membership.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I said Etienne from EMPD.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-c78421760eeb
Claiming both not knowing 'that man' and having known him about the same referent cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I am not aware of that black man. I do not know.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“because I knew him”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-e5b0f5a01ce6
A denies greeting Viandre; B concedes greeting was possible—directly opposing claims about same act and referent.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, no, I spoke to - greetings, I did not speak to him.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“It may be possible. It may be possible.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-ec31c2547afd
Same entity, same field (repaid amount): 15000 vs 65000 cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“it is 15 000”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“it is 65 000”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-f931ce167413
A asserts he called and shouted at Stolls; B is his denial he did so. Directly opposed on same act.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“you also called Stolls and McKenzie and you shouted at them”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, no, no, no, I did not.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-fc7a5dc21533
A claims seeing EMPD vehicles at scene; B affirms seeing nothing at the scene—cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I saw some EMPD police vehicles”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes, Chair.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-0295a24f0866
Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department
Same entity (EMPD) cannot both claim the operation was theirs and confirm it was not theirs.
Day 90Fritz“they replied that this was an EMPD operation and that all relevant members were contacted and on their way.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“They confirmed that it was not their operation.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-13024e219d38
Same statement about Viandre speaking to Mkhwanazi: one denies (No), other affirms (Yes) — cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, I deny that.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-28c12f2fbbe0
Same repaid amount cannot be both ~96000 (less than 100000) and 65000.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He gave me less than 100 000 instead of 100 000”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“it is 65 000”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-2b717b51d07a
Both describe MacKenzie's relationship with Kecia at face value: one says not good terms, other says good terms—directly contradictory.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“MacKenzie and Kecia and Hanekom, they were not in good terms”
Day 90Chairperson“Adriaan MacKenzie and Kecia Stolls were in good terms”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-3ad079af77f7
Claims assert different specific repaid amounts (16000 vs 15000) for same entity; cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He gave me less than 100 000 instead of 100 000, but he paid in different months, but he paid.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“it is 15 000”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-638e617005cf
A asserts Jaco will give success; B says even with him there could be nothing—directly opposing outcomes for same entity.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Jaco will give you a success”
Day 90Chairperson“The operative word being most of the time, meaning even with him, there could be nothing”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-7f534fd600c6
Cannot both not know who Kgomotso is and affirmatively state Kgomotso was present.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, no, no”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Kgomotso was there”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-8ecc7736c15c
Same repaid amount field has incompatible values (96000 vs 16000) for same entity; cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He gave me less than 100 000 instead of 100 000”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He gave me less than 100 000 instead of 100 000, but he paid in different months, but he paid.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-91c93a24d6c5
Marius Van Der Merwe
One statement says officers were carrying firearms waiting for him; the other says no person carrying a firearm—directly contradictory.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“in the other statement he talks about officers who were carrying firearms, you see, waiting for him”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“in the other statement there is no person who was carrying a firearm and who wants to kill himself, or who wants to kill him”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-93b7cc0bd6fc
Claim A says he did nothing; Claim B says he spoke to the officer within a week—cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“You did not do anything.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Now, within a space of a week, you said you spoke to the officer.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-bc2ef0ece4aa
A denies it was their operation; B affirms they were part of the operation—cannot both be true of same entity.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“They confirmed that it was not their operation.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“They were part of the operation.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c3faf1621bf4
Etienne
Claim A asserts Etienne is EMPD; Claim B affirms he is not an EMPD officer. Same person, same status—cannot both be true.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I said Etienne from EMPD.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-e5b0f5a01ce6
A firmly denies greeting/speaking to Viandre; B concedes it may be possible he did—directly opposing accounts of same interaction.
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“No, no, I spoke to - greetings, I did not speak to him.”
Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“It may be possible. It may be possible.”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days