Day 94
21 April 2026
Record: Official record ↗
Who testified
- Mr Mnisi1,651 claims
- Ms Van Den Heever29 claims
Subjects discussed
👤 Mr Mnisi👤 Sergeant Fannie Nkosi🏛 Bid Adjudication Committee👤 Adv Chaskalson SC🏛 City of Tshwane Municipality👤 Advocate Sesi Baloyi, SC🏛 Bid Evaluation Committee👤 Sandile Khumalo
18 conflicts flagged on this day
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-325983491b33Ngaphesheya
Both refer to same entity's appointment on TMPD 1; one asserts appointed, other not appointed—cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-9fb7fa5e45b1Sergeant Fannie Nkosi
A denies receipt from anyone in the BEC; B asserts receipt from BEC directly—same referent, cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-e89f723bbe32Same speaker about same referent (the brother) asserting both 'is an associate' and 'is not an associate' cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-21d2b7cf9c9dSergeant Fannie Nkosi
Same entity: 'dealing with it' directly contradicts 'not actively dealing with the matter'.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-26b2d5623e09Sergeant Fannie Nkosi
A asserts he did not want to leave traces; B explicitly rejects that same component about the same person.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-325983491b33Ngaphesheya
Same entity, same contract TMPD 1: one says not appointed, other says appointed — cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-38d1351fc6c6Wanting to communicate directly contradicts delegating the call to Sergeant Nkosi as intermediary.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-3b55c1c3f67aSergeant Fannie Nkosi
A denies any text asking for compliance; B claims he persistently said to check for compliance—cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-3e0a6219c6f8A asserts no safeguarding problems; B agrees proper safeguard measures were not implemented—directly contradictory about same documents.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-4e66a5900c17Bid Evaluation Committee
BEC cannot both recommend cancelling the tender and recommend awarding it; these are mutually exclusive outcomes for the same tender.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-78065113ff18Sergeant Nkosi
A says constant reminders about compliance; B says no text ever asks for compliance—cannot both be true of same person.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-7b54cd5943daSergeant Nkosi
Same entity: 'dealing with it' directly contradicts 'not actively dealing with the matter'.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-7e616c6409f8A says calling him removes need for meeting; B accepts meeting still expected — directly opposing positions on same meeting.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-9fb7fa5e45b1Sergeant Fannie Nkosi
One says received directly from BEC, other says not received from anyone in BEC; same entity/item, mutually exclusive.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-c659f6520503Sergeant Nkosi
Same person, same matter, same time: 'dealing with it' vs 'inactively dealing with the matter' cannot both hold as active engagement.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c6a40fc4c564Claiming no safeguarding problems directly contradicts documents disappearing in transit between Probity and BEC.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-ea65f3507d0eClaiming no safeguarding problems contradicts agreeing six documents were lost during relocation.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-f8a870959c94A says scoring couldn't be confirmed (uncertain); B states definitively he did no scoring—cannot both hold for same person.