Day 141
16 July 2026
Record: Official record ↗
Who testified
- Colonel Brian Padayachee855 claims
- Mr Ramatsekisa12 claims
Subjects discussed
👤 Brian Padayachee (Senior Investigator, IDAC; former Crime Intelligence Colonel, retired SAPS)👤 Brigadier Dineo Mokwele (civilian irregularly appointed, SAPS Crime Intelligence Technical Support)🏛 Investigative Directorate Against Corruption (IDAC)👤 Lt Gen Samuel Dumisani Khumalo👤 Chairperson: Brigadier Noema🏛 Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud👤 Fadiel Adams👤 Colonel Phillips
12 conflicts flagged on this day
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-0ae43c7a1154section 28 summons to BMW dated 31 January 2025
Same summons cannot be located in both file 9 and file 3 page 802 simultaneously.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-3295f5e8c0b9Same entity, same referent (the application form on e-Vetting): one says it has been done, the other says it has not.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-455c7ee6a012email from Mr Adams to the Minister on 1 November 2024
Same email dated 1 November per one source but 4 November per the information note; dates cannot both be correct.
“(dated 4”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-5633782dc4cdA says she cannot apply via e-Vetting as a civilian; B says her application was done on e-Vetting—same entity, incompatible.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-6701c68ef07femail from Mr Adams to the Minister on 1 November 2024
Same email dated 4 November per note but 1 November 08:21 per other source; dates cannot both be true.
“(dated 4”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-a17944521cffAnnexure MK15
Same annexure MK15 assigned two different dates: 30 July 2025 vs 6 December 2024.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-3295f5e8c0b9Claims directly assert the application form both was and was not done on the e-Vetting system for the same entity.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-40c736c53cccA asserts evidence of Khumalo's interference in the docket; B asserts nothing points to his interference—directly opposed on same referent.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-68f501b83b8eInvestigative Directorate Against Corruption
A says serious cases normally get J50 summonses; B says as a matter of course they apply for arrest warrants—J50 is a summons, not a warrant, so same procedure described inconsistently.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-99de9652ec87A claims pre-interview vetting disadvantaged her; B claims the completed clearance gave her undue advantage — opposite effects of same vetting.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-c6f1e9c132e2A says pre-interview vetting disadvantaged her; B says it gave her the advantage of going for the interview—directly opposite claims about same act.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-d7149e1ec9dbSame person, same panel: one says member, other denies membership; cannot both be true.