decision2025-07-29 – 2025-08-06E000341
Carrim's attorneys' engagement with 29 July 2025 ruling
The Evidence Leader provided a specialist's name to Mr Carrim's representatives, who forwarded it to the family and doctor. The Commission heard nothing from the attorneys and requested a response on consent to an independent medical evaluation.
5 claims from testimony
"We provided the name of such a specialist to Mr Carrim's representatives on the day after the ruling"
"we received a response from Mr Carrim's attorney saying that they had forwarded that information to the family and to the treating doctor"
"On the 31st of July, we received a response from Mr Carrim's attorney"
"we heard nothing further from Mr Carrim's attorneys"
"especially a response as to whether Mr Carrim has consented to an independent medical evaluation"