WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 31

12 November 2025

Who testified

Subjects discussed

🏛 City of Ekurhuleni Metropolitan Municipality👤 Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi (suspended EMPD/Metro chief; admits payments from Cat Matlala)👤 Dr Imogen Mashazi👤 Ms Gxasheka (HOD HR)👤 Jabulani Isaac Mapiyeye🏛 Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department (EMPD) / the City👤 Chris Steyn (fleet manager)🏛 Transport and Fleet Management department

20 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-416848be54f8
A says he was suspended; B says he is not suspended—same person, same status, cannot both be true.
Day 57Adv Behari (Kemi)“he was suspended as a result of the action being taken by the city, arising out of questions posed by the Premier”
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-5d504f7d7213
Same person's suspension status: one says not suspended, other says still suspended—cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“but I am still suspended”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-62a16a94f4e4
Suspension dated December 2025 vs May 2023 cannot both be the same suspension event/date.
Day 57Adv Khumalo SC“He was suspended in December 2025”
Day 31Mr Nciza“Yes, 24 May”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-6754dc66878e
Same person, same time: cannot be both suspended and back at work simultaneously.
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“but I am still suspended”
Day 31Mr Nciza“But Mkhwanazi is back at work.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-6998e809b58d
Claim A denies suspension while Claim B admits being suspended; same entity, same status—cannot both be true.
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
Day 91Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I was suspended.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-8ab27607f18d
Same entity's status: 'not suspended' vs 'on suspension' cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
Day 91Commissioner Mkhwanazi“you were on suspension”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-a918855b6dc6
A states he is still on suspension; B states he is back at work—cannot both be true of same person at same time.
Day 89Commissioner Mkhwanazi“I am still on suspension”
Day 31Mr Nciza“But Mkhwanazi is back at work.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-b0a997d4978b
A claims he has proof/authority document; B states he did not provide the signed MOA—the claimed proof is absent.
Day 56Adv Baloyi SC“Brigadier Mkhwanazi provides what he considers a full answer to I was authorised, there was authority, and he has proof of it.”
Day 31Mr Nciza“Mr Mkhwanazi who gave us these documents, they have not given us a signed Memorandum of Agreement”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-b5082c33626d
Same person's employment status cannot be both 'on suspension' and 'back at work' simultaneously.
Day 91Commissioner Mkhwanazi“you were on suspension”
Day 31Mr Nciza“But Mkhwanazi is back at work.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-b6cc5ec06607
A says suspended for three months; B says not suspended—cannot both be true of same person.
Day 91Commissioner Mkhwanazi“It was three months suspension”
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-d777d9276ced
Same person's suspension dated to two different times (Feb 2023 vs Dec 2025); both cannot be the suspension date.
Day 31Adv Motlhasedi“Brigadier Mkhwanazi was suspended in February of 2023”
Day 57Adv Khumalo SC“He was suspended in December 2025”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-d8259869d857
Same suspension can't occur in Feb 2023 and in December after Commission testimony; dates/triggers incompatible.
Day 31Adv Motlhasedi“Brigadier Mkhwanazi was suspended in February of 2023”
Day 57Adv Khumalo SC“He was suspended in December after testimony in this Commission”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-3ee0060e7f10
A says Mashazi instructed to stop the investigation; B says she did not stop or interfere in its withdrawal—directly contradictory.
Day 31Mr Nciza“When that came to Mashazi's attention, she then instructed that we can that investigation”
Day 41Doctor Mashazi“I did not stop or interfere in the withdrawal of the investigation”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-732a65ac8b4d
Same person's disciplinary process: expected dismissal in June vs. actually got off scot-free (no consequence) cannot both hold.
Day 31Mr Nciza“You have a person who was supposed to be disciplined and potentially be dismissed in June.”
Day 32Mr Nciza“he got off scot-free”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-8fb7a2d09c97
A asserts a norm requiring a donation letter for vehicle donations; B states no process exists for these donations—mutually exclusive.
Day 31Chris Steyn“this is the norm, as my understanding, a CID programme, seizure programme, and how they give vehicle donations were donated only on a donation letter”
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Then he said, you know what, we do not have a process that we follow in terms of donations of these vehicles”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-92fe2eac9f00
EMPD VIP Protection Unit
Same members' rank cannot simultaneously be inspector and constable level.
Day 31Mr Nciza“everybody that is a VIP protection unit member is an inspector”
Day 42Doctor Mashazi“VIP protectors, they are at which level? The constable level”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-9937ede1d7e8
He states reliance should be premised on signed documents, yet actually relied on an unsigned letter—contradictory standard vs conduct.
Day 31Mr Nciza“even if I was to give him the benefit of the doubt, that would have to be premised on signed documents from authorised people”
Day 31Mr Nciza“he says he relied on the letter that is on page 157 to page 158, which is the letter that we had dealt with earlier on from CAT VIP Protection. The le”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-a7ea84066f9b
One says not suspended, the other says suspended in Feb 2023 — same person, cannot both hold.
Day 31Mr Nciza“The person is not suspended, you know”
Day 31Adv Motlhasedi“Brigadier Mkhwanazi was suspended in February of 2023”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-c838ce8e2c4c
EMPD VIP Protection Unit
A states all VIP unit members are inspectors; B states VIP protectors are at constable level—contradictory rank claims for same members.
Day 31Mr Nciza“everybody that is a VIP protection unit member is an inspector”
Day 42Doctor Mashazi“for me, it is an operational issue because VIP protectors, they are at which level? The constable level”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
XW-a504accb3e82
Cat Protection and Security Services
service provision basis
One claims services could not have been provided in terms of these because it is not an agreement; the other claims it is exactly this plan that provided the basis — incompatible characterizations.
Day 31Adv Baloyi SC“they could not have been provided in terms of these, because this is not an agreement”
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“it is this plan.”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days