Day 59

12 February 2026

Who testified

Ms Masuku519 claims
Thulani Magagula83 claims

Subjects discussed

👤 Nomsa Puriti Masuku👤 Mr Magagula (IPID investigator)👤 Marius Van Der Merwe (Witness D)🏛 South African Police Service🏛 Independent Police Investigative Directorate🏛 Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department (EMPD) / the City👤 Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi (suspended EMPD/Metro chief; admits payments from Cat Matlala)👤 Alexander Fritz

4 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited

KNN-256304129c46

Mr Magagula

Two different qualifications claimed from two different universities (UJ vs TUT) for same investigator's education.

Day 59Thulani Magagula“I obtained a diploma NQF level 5 in criminal justice and forensic investigation at the University of Johannesburg.”

Day 59Thulani Magagula“I completed my national diploma in Tshwane University of Technology in 2005.”

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness

KNN-2cd06e799cc1

Commissioner Julius Mkhwanazi

A says he saw several vehicles at the scene; B says he saw nothing there—cannot both be true of same observation.

Day 59Ms Masuku“saw several vehicles, marked and unmarked, including those of private persons”

Day 90Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Yes, Chair.”

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited

NLI-9b5893041156

South African Police Service

A dates SAPS awareness to Apr 15; B says they knew hours after the incident (earlier), conflicting on same entity's awareness timing.

Day 59Ms Masuku“It is the police who got to know on the 15t h of April, not my office.”

Day 59Ms Masuku“they knew earlier. It was just hours after it happened.”

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness

NLI-adb5ce0fe1ef

The crime scene

Claim A locates primary scene at 'the house'; Claim B says scene is 'the Scania complex'—incompatible scene locations for same crime scene.

Day 59Ms Masuku“we have primary scene and the secondary scene of the deceased. So... this is the house.”

Day 106Advocate Khumalo SC“the scene is the Scania complex”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days