WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 73

9 March 2026

Record: Official record ↗

Who testified

Subjects discussed

👤 Suliman Carim👤 Mr Vusimuzi 'Cat' Matlala👤 Brown Mogotsi👤 Mr Morgan Maumela👤 Adv Mahlape Sello SC🏛 Madlanga Commission (Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Criminality, Political Interference and Corruption in the Criminal Justice System)👤 Adv Chaskalson SC👤 Mr Khumalo (counsel who argued Phala-Phala)

9 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-5921a24d3756
Suliman Carim
Same communication with Brown cannot be both a phone call and in person.
Day 73Mr Carrim“I called him”
Day 73Mr Carrim“It was in person”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-8b7d82d3a89c
Brown Mogotsi
Same entity/payment: 'is done' (completed) vs 'will be done' (future) cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 73Mr Carrim“Mr Mogotsi said payment is done.”
Day 73Mr Carrim“Mr Mogotsi says payment will be done.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-b339d924c808
Suliman Carim
A says Carrim defied the ruling; B attributes defiance to 'they', not 'us', contradicting who defied.
Day 73Adv Chaskalson SC“Mr Carrim and his legal team unilaterally took it upon themselves to defy that ruling.”
Day 73Adv Chaskalson SC“they defied that ruling, not us.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-58c5659aff0a
Suliman Carim
Claims directly conflict: being friends since 2022 vs having no relationship at all with same entity.
Day 73Mr Carrim“we became friends from about 2022”
Day 73Mr Carrim“No, not at all”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-6d19172c49d2
Suliman Carim
If first call was on the 10th, a call on the 6th cannot exist; the two claims contradict about the earliest contact date.
Day 73Mr Carrim“Yes.”
Day 73Mr Carrim“I called him first on the 10th, right on the top.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-989030f93676
Suliman Carim
A asserts a relationship with the Minister; B denies any relationship exists—cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 73Mr Carrim“I have been branded as an enabler due to my relationship with the Minister”
Day 73Mr Carrim“you have no relationship with the Minister”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-98dea9fbde0b
Suliman Carim
Claim A denies receiving/seeing the letter; Claim B affirms the screenshot acknowledged receipt of that same letter—cannot both be true.
Day 73Mr Carrim“he did not send me this letter. It is just a screenshot. I did not see the letter.”
Day 73Mr Carrim“Yes, I am sure it is that.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-bb2bbd22f67a
Suliman Carim
A asserts Carrim defied the ruling; B asserts there was no defiance of the Commission—directly opposing claims about the same conduct.
Day 73Adv Chaskalson SC“Mr Carrim and his legal team unilaterally took it upon themselves to defy that ruling.”
Day 73Adv Bhana SC“there was no defiance of the Commission, and that is incorrect.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-f55b4b93fa62
Suliman Carim
One claims Carrim defied the ruling, the other says he did not defy the Commission—directly opposing characterisations of same conduct.
Day 73Adv Chaskalson SC“Mr Carrim and his legal team unilaterally took it upon themselves to defy that ruling.”
Day 73Adv Bhana SC“Mr Carrim did not defy the Commission in not producing the statement.”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days

Source: criminaljusticecommission.org.za — official transcripts and audio. Protected and pseudonymous witnesses are not identified.

© 2026 Datastroom IT (Pty) Ltd · Published in the public interest · Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Commission