WhatTheySaid.co.za The Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Day 87

9 April 2026

Who testified

Subjects discussed

👤 Director Tshukudu Malatji👤 Deputy Commissioner Revo Spies👤 Advocate Sesi Baloyi, SC👤 Lebogang Andrew Phiri🏛 Bid Evaluation Committee🏛 City of Tshwane Municipality🏛 Tshwane Municipal Police Department🏛 Gubis

7 conflicts flagged on this day

◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-10420d680938
A asserts functions are the same as the advert; B concedes a mistake re the advert, contradicting the claimed sameness of the same appointment.
Day 87Director Malatji“the employment functions of Mr Spies as reflected on the employment advertisement are the same as my employment responsibilities. There is no material”
Day 87Director Malatji“I agree with the Commissioner. I think a mistake here was made with regard to the actual advert that caught up on Mr Spies, Revo Spies’ appointment.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-201c5ae1fc3e
Claim A quote says June 2023, Claim B says June 2013; same appointment cannot be in two different years.
Day 87Director Malatji“I was appointed on the 1st of June 2023”
Day 87Director Malatji“When I was appointed as a Director in June 2013”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-9a1d819e9fae
Quote A states appointment in 2023; quote B states 2013. Same person's appointment date cannot be both years.
Day 87Director Malatji“I was appointed on the 1st of June 2023”
Day 87Director Malatji“2013, Commissioner.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-b2a668833bf0
A claims unaware Gubis received many allocations; B shows he knew Gubis specifically received allocations—cannot both be true.
Day 87Adv Sikhakhane“I am unaware that Gubis 85 Solutions (Pty) Ltd received many allocations for the provision of ad hoc security services”
Day 99Director Malatji“And I knew it was not all of them. It was Gubis.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c208115205d3
Cannot both first encounter it here and have previously seen it in the newspaper for the same item.
Day 87Director Malatji“I am coming across it for the first time here”
Day 87Director Malatji“I saw it on the newspaper”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c727db1cb869
A denies non-compliance; B admits possibly missing one or two instructions, which is non-compliance—cannot both be fully true.
Day 87Director Malatji“it is not true that I was not complying with his instructions where it is supposed to, right”
Day 87Director Malatji“It might have happened that I missed one or two”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-fbb99d8e5379
Same speaker on same job functions: A asserts no material difference/same, B asserts not the same primary functions; cannot both be true.
Day 87Director Malatji“the employment functions of Mr Spies as reflected on the employment advertisement are the same as my employment responsibilities. There is no material”
Day 87Advocate Baloyi SC“I do not see that it is the same primary functions, unless they are written differently but mean the same thing. They are not the same on the face of ”

Claims from this day

← All hearing days