WhatTheySaid.co.zaThe Madlanga Commission record, in plain language

Deputy Commissioner Revo Spies

second in command
Deputy Commissioner Revo Spies served in the Ekurhuleni Metro Police Department (EMPD), primarily overseeing Auxiliary Support Services, including the repository of documents and records such as memoranda of understanding with other entities. He also acted as Acting Chief of Police during Commissioner Mapiyeye’s leave and as caretaker for Internal Affairs. Before the commission, Spies was expected to provide details on several criminal cases and was questioned about his knowledge of charges laid against perpetrators. His testimony addressed the misuse of blue lights and EMPD resources, agreeing that the use and sale of blue-light vehicles should be restricted to law enforcement only.
Schemes linked
What the record shows (919 total claims — 150 substantive shown)
8 contradictions on the record
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-fbb99d8e5379
Same speaker on same job functions: A asserts no material difference/same, B asserts not the same primary functions; cannot both be true.
Day 87Director Malatji“the employment functions of Mr Spies as reflected on the employment advertisement are the same as my employment responsibilities. There is no material”
Day 87Advocate Baloyi SC“I do not see that it is the same primary functions, unless they are written differently but mean the same thing. They are not the same on the face of ”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-b223f7d3d13c
A denies any formal MOUs exist; B affirms multiple signed MOUs over the years—cannot both be true for same entity.
Day 33Kelebogile Thepa“There are no formal MOU’s”
Day 28Commissioner Revo Spies“all the MOUs that we have through the years signed, be it with ACSA, the Airports Company, or with Emperors, or with Cross-Border Permit, or with othe”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-86c553828280
Same person's appointment date stated as two different dates: 1 Aug 2022 vs 1 Mar 2025, cannot both be true.
Day 28Commissioner Revo Spies“I was appointed as such on 1 August 2022”
Day 84Commissioner Spies“I was appointed on 1 March 2025”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-9f2ff15e6cc8
Same person Stella Jokazi: A says never seen her at all, B says saw her a month later in uniform—cannot both be true.
Day 30Commissioner Spies“I have not seen her at all”
Day 30Commissioner Spies“I saw her approximately a month later when she was already in uniform, wearing field dress uniform”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-b78838ed1a87
Same referent Julius: one claim says he has no documents, the other says he has documents; cannot both be true.
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He said, Julius does not have documents.”
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Julius is having documents.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-10420d680938
A asserts functions are the same as the advert; B concedes a mistake re the advert, contradicting the claimed sameness of the same appointment.
Day 87Director Malatji“the employment functions of Mr Spies as reflected on the employment advertisement are the same as my employment responsibilities. There is no material”
Day 87Director Malatji“I agree with the Commissioner. I think a mistake here was made with regard to the actual advert that caught up on Mr Spies, Revo Spies’ appointment.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-b78838ed1a87
Same referent (Julius, documents) with directly opposite assertions: has vs. does not have; cannot both be true simultaneously.
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“Julius is having documents.”
Day 43Commissioner Mkhwanazi“He said, Julius does not have documents.”
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-665b3ec2b91b
Same person's appointment cannot be both a fixed 5-year section-56 contract and a permanent post until age-65 retirement.
Day 84Commissioner Spies“I was appointed as a section-56 contract employee for a period of five years”
Day 84Commissioner Spies“I was appointed as a permanent employee till I reached the compulsory retirement age of 65 years”