Day 107
13 May 2026
Record: Official record ↗
Who testified
- Warrant Officer Phakula609 claims
- Advocate Mosikili91 claims
Subjects discussed
👤 Warrant Officer Boy Steve Phakula (SAPS National Intervention Unit)👤 Warrant Officer Marumo Joseph Magane👤 Mr Teboho Mosikili👤 Major General Feroz Khan🏛 National Investigation Unit (NINU)🏛 Dog Unit🏛 Directorate for Priority Crime Investigation👤 Colonel Sephungu
19 conflicts flagged on this day
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-09a9e6ab2f13One claim says Phakula breached exhibit-handling protocol; the other says he did nothing wrong—cannot both be true of same conduct.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-1a47954eed07National Investigation Unit
A says NINU is the same as NIU; B says it is a different unit—same referent, directly contradictory.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-1c3021ec511eA claims he smelled suspected cocaine; B claims he could smell it was drug but not cocaine—cannot both be true of same statement.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-5f8571e1e821Claim A affirms he was at the scene; Claim B states he was not at the scene—directly contradictory about same referent.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-7711f57b7b32National Investigation Unit
A says NINU is a different unit from NIU; B says NINU is the same as NIU. Same entity, cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-8479db73779aClaim A says Phakula breached exhibit-handling protocol; Claim B says he did nothing wrong. Both about same conduct; cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
KNN-b0a0c349278aNational Investigation Unit
Claim A says NINU is the same as NIU; Claim B says it is a different unit—directly contradictory about same referent.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
KNN-db049deeee04A says conduct breached exhibit-handling protocol; B affirms nothing wrong with same conduct—cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-1a47954eed07National Investigation Unit
Claims directly disagree on whether NINU is the same as or different from NIU—cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-2bbea0343097The crime scene
Same scene: A asserts handled in line with National Instruction 1 of 2015, B concedes it was not; direct contradiction.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-3f80e2fc16f0The crime scene
Both refer to same scene's handling; poorly managed vs. handled per SAPS instruction cannot both be true simultaneously.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-4a5d80e13d03Crime Information Management Analysis Centre
One claim says CIMAC falls under Crime Intelligence, the other explicitly denies it—same entity, same relation, directly contradictory.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-58c32e8f842eCannot be both the first responding officer at a scene and an office-bound station-based person; roles are mutually exclusive.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-5dd6d944502fCrime Information Management Analysis Centre
A ties CIMAC to Crime Intelligence as a link; B explicitly denies it falls under Crime Intelligence—direct contradiction on same referent.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-7711f57b7b32National Investigation Unit
Same entity NINU claimed both identical to NIU and a distinct separate unit; cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-b0a0c349278aNational Investigation Unit
Claim A says NINU is the same unit as NIU; Claim B says it is a different unit—directly contradictory about same referent.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-c78190fe0f28Same person claims drugs could be smelled yet also that drugs do not smell; cannot both be true.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited◆ Cross-witness
NLI-eb82a7fd4787Crime Information Management Analysis Centre
Claim A says CIMAC is a department in Crime Intelligence; Claim B says it does not fall under Crime Intelligence—directly contradictory.
◎ Likely — AI-assisted, cited
NLI-fb104e1c7747Same person re same scene attendance: one says he gave permission to go, other says he instructed not to go—cannot both be true.