WhatTheySaid.co.zaThe Madlanga Commission record, in plain language
appointmentApril 2023E000151

IPID investigation assigned to Ms Masuku under s28(1)(g)

IPID assigned the precious stones investigation to senior investigator Nomsa Masuku under section 28(1)(g) of the IPID Act, classifying it as corruption due to the misrepresentation used to gain access.

Described by 2 witnesses
Thuso Keefelakaeday 58Nomsa Puriti Masukuday 58
Each of these people gave first-hand evidence about this event. Several accounts of the same event is a property of the record — it is not verification, and witnesses can be mistaken together.
6 claims from testimony
"That one would fall under section 28(1)(g), which is corruption"
falls under section 28 1 subsectionMr KeefelakaeCL0057332
"the manner in which it happened, there was some kind of misrepresentation in the process"
reason for classification as corruptionMr KeefelakaeCL0057333
"the matter is with us"
statusMr KeefelakaeCL0057334
"precious stones, I was involved in the investigation of that matter"
investigator involvementMs MasukuCL0058213
"we do have the lead investigator on that matter"
lead investigator assignedMs MasukuCL0058214
"I am the lead investigator"
role in caseNomsa Puriti MasukuMs MasukuCL0058217